The Big Minimalist Training Lie [Part 1]
Note: This is Part 1 of 2 of my minimalist training article series.
You can read part 2 here.
Minimalist training is so hot right now.
Like hotter than Alexandra Daddario in True Detective.
The basic idea behind minimalist training is to train as little as humanly possible in a way that still gets results.
Typically this involves training 2-3x per week, only doing 2-3 exercises, for no more than 30-60 min.
And then there are the guys out there who say you can get ripped in 15 minutes per day with nothing but your bodyweight and a towel.
Sounds pretty awesome, right?
Why should I train 4+ times per week if I can get the same results with 2-3x per week?
And hey, a towel? We all have those. Fuck weights.
But there’s a big fat lie about minimalist workouts that very few people seem to talk about.
The big minimalist training lie – it doesn’t work for everyone
When someone says something like “Oh I’m only training 2-3x per week for 30 minutes and I’m losing fat and building muscle,” I can’t help but shake my head.
But that’s the truth.
A typical minimalist training program might look like this:
- Front squat – 3 sets x 5 reps
- Pull ups – 3 sets x 5 reps
- Lunges – 3 sets x 5 reps per leg
- Barbell row – 3 sets x 5 reps
- Bench press – 3 sets x 5 reps
- Standing military press – 3 sets x 5 reps
So a routine like this isn’t necessarily bad…
It works if you’re a:
- beginner who wants to build muscle
- beginner who wants to lose fat
- person who just really wants a way to stay in shape
But that’s about it.
You can get to single digit body fat levels and look decent. If you need someone for comparison sake, you will most likely build a body akin to Ryan Gosling in Crazy Stupid Love.
And if that’s your goal, awesome. I won’t tell you what your ideal body should or shouldn’t be.
But if you want to pack on substantially more muscle and strength and build a body that looks more like a fitness model or superhero, then you need to increase your total amount of volume and/or training frequency.
That’s just how it is.
Especially when training research shows that higher frequency training is best for building muscle, how can you expect to spend the rest of your life doing these 30 minute minimalist routines?
You need to understand fucking context
Context is absolute king when it comes to everything in life.
It’s like reading books.
For example, if you read Green Eggs and Ham (one of my favorite books EVER) and you only read the end where “Sam-I-Am” finally tries the green eggs and ham and says “I do so like green eggs and ham. Thank you. Thank you, Sam-I-Am,” then that just makes no damn sense.
You need to start from the beginning and get to know the deep, complex nature of the characters and why motherfucking “Sam-I-Am” didn’t want to eat the green eggs and ham in the first place.
You need context or nothing makes sense or works.
Same with minimalist training….
You can’t just do a minimalist training program like the one above and say that’s the best routine for you.
What are your goals?
If you’re a newbie who has never lifted before, a minimalist training approach is good.
But if you’re an intermediate lifter who has been lifting for 3+ years and wants to gain more muscle, doing a routine like the one above is just stupid. I guarantee it’s not going to work. In this case you would most likely need a higher volume routine where you train 3x per week while implementing different lifting styles or a higher frequency routine (4-5x per week).
Minimalist training is sexy but it’s not a magic bullet
There’s nothing sexier in the world than saying you can get amazing results by only doing a fraction of the amount of work.
That’s exactly why diet pills and supplements sell so well. People believe that if they take a diet pill, they don’t need to do anything else.
They believe all their fat ass problems can be solved with one magic pill but nothing could be further from the truth and when they’ve flushed $200 down the drain on supplements, they finally learn “the hard way” that the only way to get in amazing shape is through hard work and sweat.
I am definitely not saying minimalist training is useless. It definitely works for the groups of people I outlined above but if you constantly want to progress, you need to adjust your training accordingly and that means you need to put in more work.
Minimalist Adaptive Training (MAT) – A contextual approach to minimalist training that works
MAT is a contextual approach to minimalist training that works.
This Bruce Lee quote sums up MAT perfectly:[x_blockquote cite=”Bruce Lee” type=”center”]Adapt what is useful, reject what is useless, and add what is uniquely your own.[/x_blockquote]
So what this means is that MAT is built on the “cut out all the useless shit” foundation that traditional minimalist training is built on, but at the same time, dynamically adjust your training as needed as your goals change and you get more advanced.
It’s a very simple but powerful concept.
And it’s a big part of the non-fitness lifestyle.
I will go into much more detail about MAT and how to apply it to your own workouts in Part 2 of this article.
So stay tuned 🙂
If you have any questions about minimalist training, be sure to leave them below.